Should you use QuarkXPress in 2025?
QuarkXPress is the historic desktop publishing giant that reigned supreme before the Adobe era. Today, it continues to offer a robust alternative for professional layout, even if it is less in the spotlight than its direct competitor. But in 2025, with all the innovations available, is it really the right tool for your graphic design projects? I have spent many hours working with it, and I will break down its simplicity, key features, and real limitations for you. My goal? To give you an objective opinion so you can decide whether it still meets your specific needs.
My experience with QuarkXPress
QuarkXPress is a tool that has been with me for years, long before the Easy Web adventure. I have seen its evolution, its ups and downs, but one thing has remained constant throughout all these versions: its robustness and unmatched precision for print layout.
For complex publishing projects—magazines, catalogs, technical books—it's a real workhorse. Its handling of text, typographic grids, and colors is rock-solid reliable, which is essential when every millimeter counts for the final print. This is where it excels, where it justifies its status in traditional workflows.
That said, we need to be realistic. Its interface may seem outdated compared to more modern software, and its learning curve is steeper if you're not used to the demands of desktop publishing. For web or UI/UX design, it's clearly not the first tool I would put in your hands.
Is QuarkXPress really useful for my needs?
The real question to ask yourself before using QuarkXPress is: what is my goal? Because its relevance depends on how it is used. For complex and voluminous print publications—magazines, newspapers, catalogs—with specific typographical and production requirements, it remains formidable. It is the tool of choice for industrial workflows.
Whether you're an expert layout artist, publishing graphic designer, or print production manager, QuarkXPress offers unparalleled control. Imagine producing hundreds of pages of annual reports, massive product catalogs, or daily newspapers: its robustness and precision are key assets for maintaining consistency and efficiency.
Another crucial strength lies in its advanced text management and automation features. Features such as XPress Tags and Conditional Content allow you to automate complex layouts or manage dynamic updates, significantly reducing errors and production time on large projects. This saves professionals a huge amount of time.

Is QuarkXPress suitable for beginners?
If you're new to professional design, QuarkXPress may seem like a mammoth task. However, it has unexpected advantages that can help you build your foundations. Its highly structured approach, with its precise grid systems and dedicated boxes (text, image), requires a level of rigor that pays off from the very beginning. For a simple flyer, business card, or basic report, you'll quickly find your feet. And its stability? A valuable asset when you're just starting out.
And the advantage it offers you right from the start is its mastery of Master Pages. Even without experience, you can design consistent templates, a cornerstone for building any project. QuarkXPress immerses you directly in "real" publishing design, far from the distractions of all-in-one tools. It teaches you the value of structure and precision.
How much does QuarkXPress cost?
In 2025, let's be clear about the cost of QuarkXPress: it's a significant investment. Far from traditional subscription models, QuarkXPress mainly opts for a perpetual license, often costing around $1,000 to $1,300. Add to that an annual budget of $300 to $400 for updates and advanced support. Who is it for? Definitely not for novice freelancers or small web agencies. At Easy Web, we know that this tool is aimed at established publishing agencies and print design studios that handle large volumes or complex projects (catalogues, magazines). Their need for precision and robustness fully justifies this financial commitment.
What are the key features of QuarkXPress?
When I look at QuarkXPress, its historical strength in layout and advanced typography is still there. The precision of the controls over each element, from kerning (adjusting the spacing between characters) to basic grids, remains impressive. For complex print projects or documents requiring absolute precision, this is a major asset. This granular control, I assure you, makes all the difference for a flawless result.
Another strong point, especially for us in 2025, is its ability to handle multiple channels. QuarkXPress allows you to convert your print designs into various digital formats such as HTML5 or interactive eBooks. This is an essential feature if you are working on projects that need to be published on different media. Although less focused on "pure web design" than others, it offers a consistent solution for expanding the reach of your publications.

Honestly, when I have to juggle layouts for a thousand different media, I often turn to QuarkXPress FlexLayouts. It's a real breath of fresh air. Imagine: you design once, and the software automatically adapts to different screen ratios, from print to mobile. For us at Easy Web, it saves us a tremendous amount of time on multi-platform projects, where every pixel counts for brand consistency.
And that's not all. Its ability to export to interactive HTML5 is a gold mine. No more complicated conversions! You can create digital magazines, interactive reports, or eBooks with videos and animations directly from the software. This is a major asset for agencies like ours that want to offer rich and immersive digital experiences without having to worry about third-party tools.
So, let's talk business. At Easy Web, since 2020, we quickly realized that QuarkXPress, despite its pedigree, had its limitations for our digital and collaborative projects. It struggles with complex web layouts, interactive content management, and simultaneous teamwork. We quickly found ourselves juggling exports and versions, which was a real hindrance to the speed required in 2025.
This is where giants such as Adobe InDesign or even the agile Affinity Publisher take over. They excel where QuarkXPress stumbles, particularly in cloud workflow and multi-platform integration. But beware, Quark is not dead! For highly specialized publishing and pure print—think technical magazines or art books—its robustness and ultra-fine typographic management are still an asset.
In summary, based on our usage:
Advantages:
- Proven stability for printing.
- Precise typographical control.
- Reliability on large print volumes.
Disadvantages:
- Outdated interface.
- High cost.
- Poor collaborative support.
- Lack of digital agility.
FAQ
Is it reliable and secure?
Concerned about reliability? That's understandable. With QuarkXPress, you're investing in a cornerstone of editorial design. Its longevity in the market is proof of its robustness and stability. When it comes to security, the Quark teams make it a point of honor to release frequent updates. This fixes potential vulnerabilities and ensures the integrity of your files and the confidentiality of your creative data. It's a platform we've always felt confident using for our most critical projects.
Is it compatible with my other tools?
Yes, compatibility is solid for standard formats. Think especially of PDF: QuarkXPress excels at exporting files ready for print or the web, which is a strength I've always appreciated. It handles images (TIFF, JPEG, PNG) and vectors (EPS) without any problems. However, expect less fluidity with native files from other software, such as InDesign or Illustrator. Often, an intermediate export is necessary. It integrates well into a graphics workflow, provided you know how.
Is there responsive customer support?
We all know that when a project is urgent, responsive support is vital. With QuarkXPress, this is an area where Easy Web's experience has been mixed in the past. In 2025, I can see that efforts are being made, particularly through their customer portal and updates.
However, don't always expect an instant response like you would get from live chat for every little issue. Email support and the ticket system are the main channels. For critical issues, support is generally good, but for more minor usage questions, patience is sometimes required. The community remains a valuable resource.
What do other users think?
QuarkXPress retains a loyal user base, particularly in publishing and prepress. Its robustness for complex layouts is often highlighted. However, many perceive it as having a steeper learning curve than its current competitors. Pricing and an interface that may seem less intuitive are frequently cited as drawbacks. Feedback converges on its reliability for print, but often expresses a desire for more seamless integrations for modern digital workflows.
Can I easily change later?
Switching from QuarkXPress to other solutions, such as the Adobe suite, requires some preparation. For example, .qxp files do not open natively in InDesign. You will need to convert them, often with layout adjustments or minor formatting losses. It's not impossible, but it does involve time and resources for corrections. Carefully consider future integration with your other production tools. This is an important point to consider for your workflow.
Alternatives
.avif)
Specializing in business creation, sales and digital marketing, he puts his expertise at the service of users to help them identify the solutions best suited to their needs. Passionate about digital innovation and online performance optimization, Alexis is committed to providing detailed, transparent and unbiased comparisons.
Do you have an entrepreneurial project?
We support you in structuring and developing your tech project. Make an appointment with one of our Business Strategists.


.avif)


